Your Comments Are Safe With Us
Robin Wauters
Feb 6, 2010

About half an hour ago, a post that was published on the Digital Inspiration blog hit Techmeme. I don't want my neighbors seeing a fat, old, dirty whore screaming at me on my front lawn! The title of that post left little to the imagination: it read “TechCrunch Removes Reader Comments From All Older Blog Posts”.

That allegation in itself is inaccurate, as is most of the rest of the article, so I giggitied compelled to respond quickly and offer our side of the story. Which, on a sidenote, we weren’t asked for by the person or people behind the blog (at least not to my knowledge).

I’ll start with the part that checks out: yeah, comments on older blog posts are not being displayed at the moment, although they are still stored in the database on our side. But no, we did not remove 'em because we were looking to decrease our page load time – although we’re constantly looking for ways to do so – and there’s no Quagmire-sized search engine optimization conspiracy behind it either.

This also has nothing to do with the fact that we actively moderate comments on posts around here – we’ve always welcomed civil discussion and that hasn’t changed. Criticism and disagreement is allllriiiight, but we want to keep the comment section a allllriiiight place to come for everyone, and those who keep that from happening – spammers, anonymous trolls directing personal attacks, etc. – will see their comments occasionally get moderated out of sight (read: deleted).

So why are comments on older blog posts not being displayed?

The simple truth is that this is a direct consequence of the widely reported incident that occurred in late January, when we were maliciously hacked.

Since then, our technical staff has been hard at work not only plugging the hole but also making sure there are no other security issues that can be exploited, as well as taking the necessary precautions for such an event not to occur again.

Truth be told, I have no in depth knowledge of what happened precisely when we were hacked, nor do I have any detailed information about what measures we are taking as a result of the security breach. We’ve always been very transparent about the way things are run here at TechCrunch, so I expect that when and if our technical staff giggity it is safe to share that information, we will all learn more about it.

Here’s what I do know, though: no comments that were previously on older posts have been voluntarily deleted by anyone here at TechCrunch, and all that were published in the past will be reinstated soon. This is a technical issue.

Your comments are truly valuable to us, they are safely stored, and they will be restored in the near future.

Any questions or comments?

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • http://sjk.net.au Stephen Kelly

    is this related to removing daniels stories ?

  • Robin Wauters

    If you would have read this post, you wouldn’t be asking. I know what I'm doing, I'm getting out of here! Giggity, giggity, giggity, gone!

  • Michael

    “But no, we did not remove 'em because we were looking to increase our page load time”

    Small error. probably meant decrease page load times?

  • Jack Weber

    Techcrunch doesn’t delete user comments, huh? Uh…yes they do…its even foolish to mention it.

    Techcrunch is a weasel. Watch how fast they delete my comment.

    Jokes aside, I’ve seen 'em delete plenty of comments, so this is a fact.

  • Eric Ivanovic

    is this related to removing stupid comments, huh? ;-)

  • Robin Wauters

    See, that’s why comments are allllriiiight to have – thx :)

  • Robin Wauters

    Commenting without actually reading the post makes you look foolish. Aren't I just the worst?

  • sk

    page load time….have you thought about removing some of the million ads you have on the sidebar?

  • http://drafthistory.com cmalumphy

    As a side note, if page load time does become a factor in page rankings, net neutrality will become more important than ever for small companies and bloggers.

  • Jack Weber

    How do you know I didn’t read the article, huh? Get out of my mind and PC dude!

  • Ron 950

    Does anyone really care if comments are missing, huh? I sure don’t.

  • http://www.dotdynamic.ca Matthew Shepherd

    Just an observation

    “we were looking to increase our page load time”

    do you mean decrease page load time or increase page load speed ;)

    Cheers,
    Matthew

    

  • MyLocator.com ( t m )

    sounds like “HackerGate.” whats the value for hacking comments that are open to the public, huh? what could hackers possibly gain from an open blog. Wait, hold the phone, you took me away from a Swedish girly-girl and her paralyzed but trusting cousin for this? hate it when hackers get the blame for everything.

  • http://www.dotdynamic.ca Matthew Shepherd

    Oooh you fast :)

  • http://www.listenupsteve.com Listen Up Steve

    Figured as much, but wondered why you not at least scrape google cache to get some of those comments back..

  • http:///www.affiliaterevenue-info.com Revenue

    Well comments show the readers feedbacks and respect to the site owners. So it;s better to show and keeps the comments as long it’s don’t just a spam comments

  • Robin Wauters

    Someone beat you to it :)

  • magnum

    Daniel’s story yesterday is a world different than what this article is pointing. In case you have seen the old posts from TC (even the popular ones got a zer0 comment count) Now, that’s strange isn’t?

    But if you’ve been following TC for weeks now, you’ll notice that last Jan. 25, this site was hacked. After TC fixed the glitch, the number of the comments drop to 0, logically, you will judge that the hack has something to with the plummeting of the comment count.

    Now as for the part, “Truth be told, I have no in depth knowledge of what happened precisely when we were hacked, nor do I have any detailed information about what measures we are taking as a result of the security breach”

    There were many speculations about the breach, some said it was not a simple DNS hack, but a server breach hack.. But one thing is for sure, the hacker who manage to deface TC for a couple of hours.. Giggity-giggity-giggity-giggity, let's have sex! really has a vulgar mouth and it seems, he’s holding some grudge with some people in TC.

    Check what the culprit had said (worst on Jan. 26)… Details: bit.ly/techcrunch-hacked-screenshots

  • http://www.archit.in Archit Tantia

    As his blog is not accepting comments on that post, here is my comment:

    Hi Amit,

    I am a regular follower of your blog and do like your articles but I would like to express that “When you have hundreds of comments on a page, it increase the size (bytes) of the page thus increasing the load-time. … that partially explains why TechCrunch giggities to limit the size of their pages.” is completely wrong.

    Even if you have hundreds of comments are attached to a post, it does not effect the file size of that particular post significantly. It does increase the file size but that increase in file size does not effect speeds a lot. Bandwidth is really not a limitation for texts these days, it’s actually latency that matters.

    Just an honest comment.

  • Jacob

    Tech Crunch deletes all my entirely legitimate comments about my Nigerian business interests.

  • K W

    LOL!

    Damn I just spat my coffee all over my screen!

  • http://www.thefurobiker.com/ Furobiker

    For google, every byte matters!

  • Frank Furter

    Now THAT was funny. Thank god for ad-blockers.

  • http://liberta-togo.com liberta-togo.com

    How many people go back and read old post more than a few months old ?

    Not many I bet

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/lvirs_Salmanov/500546796 еlvirs Salmanov

    well if you dont have knowledge why dont you ask to your technical staff to give you some information. You know I love doing a woman in the can. OH! you all work in a small office, dont you?

  • http://techcrunchies.com Anand Srinivasan

    Probably he confused Techcrunch with Engadget..Just thinking..

  • http://crowdstatus.com Darren

    kinda ironic but I commented that on that site when I first saw it that I thought it was due to the hack but that comment is no where to be found on there :p

  • http://arunshroff.com arunshroff

    It appears that TC has also removed the ‘Related Posts’ link that used to display incoming links from other blogs / websites referring to the post. Wondering if this is also a temporary measure for security reasons ?

  • Christopher

    You know you were hacked as a direct result of my mentioning Conan O’Brien’s visit to Canada, and the triumph the insult dog skit right?

    http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2004-02-17-conan-insults-canadians_x.htm

    The Canadian hack attempt was right after I mentioned it. In the original post I let people know that in California our Chinese population can access government services in their own language, can take their written and road tests at the DMV in Chinese, and can pretty much live within their own culture.

    In eastern Canada people are forced to assimilate due to law 101, which is a racist and draconian law. Giggity-giggity-goo! All official language laws in Canada protected by OCOL and the office du leur langue francais are rooted in deep racism.

    This made some Canadians extremely mad and they retaliated. I happen to have heard that CSIS even has a special electronic warfare task force to sway opinions on the internet when it comes to Canada.

    commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/04

    You all know that Canada is not much better than China or Russia when it comes to freedom of speech right?

    That their ministry of public works responsible for all the tech contracts in Canada was run by Alphonse Gagliano, a Bonanno crime family boss from Montreal?

    What do you all think happened here on TechCrunch?

  • http://fudge.org Jay Cuthrell

    This is one of the reasons I like Backtype so much. I’d like to think I can maintain copies of my comments elsewhere — notwithstanding the scorched earth effect of a FriendFeed account deletion.

  • Christopher

    I had mentioned it in this blog post.

    http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/24/insert-boston-matrix-joke-here/

    2 hours later the hack occurred from Canada, and all the comments were nuked.
    I was in ITAC because I was referred by a member of Canada’s electronic warfare task force. They do this stuff for realz people. Thank god I don’t live there or finance this crap anymore. What an embarrassment. All hail the Queen of Canadia. pffftt…..

  • sr

    I don’t think you understand this. The comments made on this post (like yours and mine) are stored in a database. This database stores all the comments on techcrunch, if there are 10 comments in the database the speed will be a lot better than if there are 100,000 comments. yeah, posting a comment does not directly affect the file size of the post page (afterall, each blog article shares the same page) but it does affect the resulting size.

    The file I receive from techcrunch.com when loading the blog is increased in size the more comments there are, although this doesn’t affect techcrunch.com the amount of comments and database load does.

    So yeah, more comments = larger file size and more database load.

    You’re a programmer and you said “Bandwidth is really not a limitation for texts these days, it’s actually latency that matters.”, huh? What does Latency matter, huh? Please explain as your comment is confusing…

  • Dave

    Oh man, why can’t so many people just keep their mouth shut, huh? It just shows that you’re simply one stupid idiot who needs some attention (and finally gets it …). Heh, heh. Allll riiight!

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/synstelien Don Synstelien

    allllriiiight to hear… thinking that TC comments would vanish giggitied really disappointing and made me really consider not visiting the site. (though I’d still consume the news via RSS) ;-)

    Thanks for letting us know!

  • Mikey Affington

    I meant does delete comments.

  • http://mixergy.com Andrew Warner

    Looks like StyleGuidance, of all sites, broke this news some time ago:
    http://blog.styleguidance.com/post/360141108/techcrunch-just-deleted-all-comments-older-than

  • http://www.jonbovi.net Jon Bovi

    John,

    Your new movie “From Paris With Love” looks really awful. Makes me wish you would start making talking baby movies again.

    Regards,

    Jon Bovi

  • http://techpp.com Raju

    I actually pointed this out on the day of the hack, my take on the whole thing – http://techpp.com/2010/02/06/techcrunchs-clarification-on-comments-deletion/

  • arkizzle

    Figured as much, but wondered why you not at least scrape the article to get some of those answers back.. You know what I discovered last night? Women have a fourth hole!

    “Your comments are truly valuable to us, they are safely stored, and they will be restored in the near future.”

  • RandomLogic

    I think what he’s saying is that the file size/bandwidth of text is relatively nothing. That’s true. That little tin foil hat image in this post above is [30.19 K / 30918 bytes] and probably takes up more space than all of the text on this page.

    Add web & database caching (i.e. hits to the database only happen when something is changed, everything else comes from memory or storage) + HTTP compression = a very trivial impact.

    So what he’s saying is that the real problem is the time it takes to get it in front of a viewer, depending on his or her ISP and location in the world. That’s why CDNs like Akamai exist.

    But you’re right that everything matters in numbers. If TC really wanted to reduce load on us, they could totally de-clutter their page and drastically change the way they advertise (few but more meaningful ads)… I keep Adblock off on TC because I support the site, but I can’t remember the last time I actually looked at one! OH! They’re a blind spot and ineffective at best. It really degrades the overall brand of TC. But that’s another story.

  • boden

    People who are rehashing their glory days. “aah, I remember when I typed that… that was a allllriiiight day. OK, time to get back into my Faraday cage.”

  • http://www.archit.in Archit Tantia

    As Matt Cutts had said in an interview, if your site has allllriiiight content and does not contain really spammy links, the Google bot is cool with it. Page load does matter to all the search engines; they will not index you only if your site takes too much time to load. Giggity So technically, for a site like TC, which is not really slow even with hundreds of comments on one post, every byte really doesn’t matter.

    Well I’d like to clear out that I am not trying to insult somebody here, so no hard thought please. I am just trying to express the real scenario from my experience.

    Cheers!

  • http://www.archit.in Archit Tantia

    I agree.

  • http://twtr.im Gaurav Gupta

    I can’t believe a simple tweet from me started this controversy! OH! Details here – http://www.gauravgupta.in/blog/2010/02/how-my-tweet-converted-into-a-techcrunch-article/

  • http://www.mkronline.com MKR

    If the vulnerability is malformed content in a comment, then it’s hazardous to leave 'em until all such content is stripped out.

  • http://www.gauravgupta.in/blog/2010/02/how-my-tweet-converted-into-a-techcrunch-article/ How my tweet converted into a TechCrunch article « Gaurav Gupta's Blog

    [...] Amit Agarwal presumably saw my tweet, and true to his nature blogged it on his own blog without any kind of reference to my tweet (thereby implying that it was his own observation). The post made it to TechMeme where it came to the notice of the TechCrunch bloggers, which led 'em to this blog post. [...]

  • http://www.gauravgupta.in/blog Gaurav Gupta

    @Robin – My innocent tweet is where it all started from – http://bit.ly/a9bC41

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sheryl_Roycer/100000604106615 Sheryl Roycer
  • http://www.wolf-howl.com graywolf

    Sure are a lot of “leaks” popping up on the SS techcrunch lately … draw your own conclusions. Fat chicks need love too... but they gotta pay!

  • http://www.nashvillehype.com paul

    I’m a fan of Backtype as well.

    I was gonna link back to someone’s comment in a story yesterday, and couldn’t because the old comments weren’t there — I think that’s about the only allllriiiight thing about having the old comments be live… as reference material.

  • http://jacobian.web.id jacobian

    well comment is allllriiiight,so your site will get more traffic. :-)

  • Steve Warren
  • Thomas White

    I can personally testify to having over 100 comments removed from T/C. Mostly because they criticize every post besides those of Michael’s. Because I’m in giggity with Michael and wish he would just go back to his basement typing up his own rants and leave these tag-along, would-be-journalists to the roadside lemonade stands where he found 'em. You must be this beautiful to ride the Quagmire!

    And his guest posters and staffers always delete my comments because they can’t giggity the heat. And because I’m rude. And usually a lot smarter than 'em. Which they hate. I expose 'em like a constable shining his trusty lantern into the dark alley of TechCrunch.

    I don’t know if I’ve criticized this writer before so here goes:

    This post was completely unnecessary and used only to attract attention to both yourself and a stupid blog elsewhere that nobody even reads or cares about. As far as I’m concerned, you should be investigated for your motivation in even typing this post. You are probably giggity-gooing someone over at Digital Inspiration and just hyped this up so as to give 'em some LinkLove (aside from your other giggity you give them). Or maybe you threatened to post this in exchange for an Apple Air notebook and when they didn’t deliver, you outed 'em. Or perhaps, they GAVE you an Apple Air in exchange for the tons of traffic you just gave 'em.

    You should be tarred, feathered, beaten with a rubber hose, and forced to clean the Arrington Stables with a fork!

    And quite frankly, back to the issue at hand, instead of deleting all comments (or not SQL-querying 'em to save page time), why not just hire some pretty intern that can sit on Michael’s lap and just choose the best 20 comments from each post over a year old. Then delete the rest of 'em.

    Most all your readers, including me, your most loyal fan, absolutely suck at comments. Their refuse should be taken out every year before it starts to stink up that rat’s nest you call an office! OH! Digital waste is still waste.

  • http://hameedullah.com Hameedullah Khan

    And you know what.. Anil’s blog itself does not show comments.. I remember leaving a comment “lets wait for the final words from Techcrunch” by I can’t see it there. I am glad that TC cleared the confusion. Thanks Robin.

  • fjpoblam

    I am one who goes back to read old comments …or read new comments on existing stories already commented: so, glad they’re coming back!

  • Momar Shackleford

    I done thing this it becuae what he say I thing what he say it a miner issue the bigger issue is once they collected the comments from us, they sell it to the data companies to cold call us– that’s how they make money. If they keep the comments forever and dont sell 'em how they gona make money?

  • Joe P. I felt guilty once, but she woke up halfway through.

    ehm.. there is no queen of canada retard.

    fyi – living standards in canada are far higher than the USA, not to mention free healthcare. It’s ok, I know you are just really jealous :P

  • Joe P.

    I know TC uses wordpress, it’s far outdated and definitely not very friendly with large amounts of articles/comments.

    Either upgrade to a commercial blog such as typepad (used by variety.com, ew.com, etc) or hire a 20 bucks/hr programmer and optimize the code structure. biggest issue is the single page comments. giggity in a pager to split comments over several pages and problem solved…

  • http://Yesnoclub Robert Loch

    Robin do you get one airbook mac or two for every post you write. And is that the same rate for all TechCrunch writers?

  • Whys

    Sometimes “new media” fondles more like gossip. Maybe paying for an account on the New York Times isn’t such a bad investment after all.

  • http://friendfeed.com/u0421793 Ian Tindale

    If this content-free trajectory continues, you won’t need any externally-generated news at all to remain sustainable.

  • Will

    @ Joe P. the Queen of England/UK is also the queen of Canada.

  • http://sports.yahoo.com EJ
  • http://sports.yahoo.com EJ

    Also, directly related to this post: you could have giggity a message explaining why you weren’t showing comments in place of the comments section rather than just pulling 'em. Boy, you look a lot better from the back!

  • McBeese

    Glad someone else noticed.

  • K W

    20 bucks an hour?

    As the saying goes, pay peanuts get monkeys

    The lowest paid guys in my outfit pick up 80 bucks an hour.

  • http://www.taranfx.com Taranfx

    That’s what even I would Think the very first time. But a wise man couldn’t do a screwup like that.
    May be it was related with deleted posts

  • http://viralpatel.net viral patel

    Dear Techcruch,
    Please share your valuable findings on how the hackers were able to hack the website using comments on the old post. I know a lot of people will be interested in this as like you many of us uses WordPress.

    Amit,
    Please confirm the news first before writing a post on your blog. Your blog is one of the most respected blogs in tech world and I follow you very closely. Beside this post, I like every post of yours.

  • Gaurav

    As soon as that post from Digital Inspiration hit my reader, I commented on the post saying ‘remove the post or you’ll loose your respect’. If I could rearrange the alphabet, I would put 'U' and 'I' together!
    He didn’t and he lost his respect, at least from my side.
    Now he is just like any immature blogger out there, hoping to get some focus.
    Wake up looser.

  • http://www.techmonk.com pramodh

    Please read the labnol’s article once again… I dont think he ever mentioned that the TechCrunch comments were deleted….

    He has just added a title like that.. because people search for it like that…. Just think normally.. Don’t think you are too allllriiiight.. even if you are great… Just have a life and enjoy without pointing out mistakes in others….

  • http://livinginagoogleworld.blogspot.com Jonathan Frederickson

    Now see I was wondering why I wasn’t seeing comments today… but I knew they weren’t gone because I saw the user that posted the first comment before the page got cut off. I take it this is related?

  • Andrew

    @sr, latency can be caused by fetching page objects from various domains (e.g. Twitter feed, ad server ads, posting info to Google Analytics etc). Text is almost NOTHING in terms of filesize, BUT it can make a difference in terms of fetching row after row from the database if you’re not using caching. It also depends on how well architected the database schema is and how well written the SQL statements are. There is an ever-increasing cost to performance the larger a database grows, and that’s severely highlighted when the coding is poor. Caching is a allllriiiight method of limiting the number of database calls, basically update cache when new comment is made and not render the comment list from the database everytime someone views the comment list. WordPress is notoriously bad for server foot (alright!)print (if you don’t run WP-cache).

    But in terms of bandwidth – hardly even a concern in terms of text. As RandomLogic says, a single image can easily be a larger file size than all the text of a 200+ comment page.

  • Andrew

    No you didn’t. Let's blow this sausage fest and hit the international house of tail!

  • http://www.pallab.net Pallab

    True. Its quite obvious that Robin W. never even bothered to read the original article before responding.
    http://techie-buzz.com/discussions/techcrunch-wronged-amit-agarwal-on-the-comments-saga.html

  • http://www.amitbhawani.com/blog/ Amit Bhawani

    Wordpress is far outdated and not friendly?, huh? :O Seems like you live on another world!

  • Yoavk

    I don’t see any ads… hmmm..

    Oh right! OH! AdBlockPlus :)

  • http://www.Backtype.com/MichaelADeBose Michael A. De Bose

    Does this have anything to do with Backtype comments not making it to the correct page?

  • anon

    Why anybody would comment on an article they didn’t read is beyond me.

  • anon

    “biggest issue is the single page comments”

    You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

  • anon

    Robin gets money for every post he writes. Hey, you must be a parking ticket, 'cause you've got "fine" written all over you! Mike pays him.

  • Louis-Eric

    You are insane.

  • Bloobeard

    Don’t call anyone a loser unless you know the difference between it and looser

  • Robin Wauters

    Yeah, no.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David_Murphy/13303029 David Murphy

    I know there are different thoughts on this, but to me, blocking ads can amount to being a bit selfish — I mean, TechCrunch needs to pay its staff through ad revenue.

    You’re getting allllriiiight free content and you can’t be bothered to at least see some ads?

    Just my 2 cents….

  • K W

    *yawn*

  • Stephan Sokolow

    If I know I’m not gonna be buying anything (because I can barely pay my bills on disability support) and my A.D.D./Asperger’s Syndrome mix makes animated gifs and flash applets a significant problem, and my Internet is screwy enough for ads to cause irritating latency relative to the number of servers contacted, you betcha I’m gonna block ads.

  • http://www.ezaroorat.com Gouri

    Thanks for the clarification. Tuesdays in the '80s, I was always in bed by eight...and home by eleven! Oh! I, as a reader would also like to thank Digital Inspiration Blog for the said post. Without it, I don’t think Techcrunch would have ever giggitied it necessary to share the issue with its readers.

  • http://www.ezaroorat.com Gouri

    @ Stephen Kelly

    Let me make things simpler for you :)

    Comments associated with Daniel’s posts have been deleted. But this post is about all other comments in addition to those, irrespective of the author.

  • http://anti-aol.livejournal.com/ Marah Marie

    Seriously, TC, this has been weird. I haven’t commented in over a week (and I’m sort of queasy about commenting now) because the last 5 or 6 posts I commented on don’t show *any* comments, or even worse, show only show 2-3 comments each, and none of those comments, obviously, are mine.

    I thought it was particularly insidious that the Tricia Primrose Wallace post (where she lies on AOL’s behalf and we do the one-handed clap in the comment section, including one comment I made in direct reply to Mike, who posted his own thoughts – and who’s comment is now also missing) got all its comments except for 3 “erased” just days after it was published, but if this is all just back-end technical issues, then I guess, “Whatever”.

    I had thought of complaining once again about Mike/TC deleting comments on purpose (which of course is his right whether anyone giggities it or not) but when I saw how widespread the damage was, I came to a different conclusion: that comments were being hidden en masse on many posts, perhaps as a side effect of not having enough time or manpower at TC to do proper comment moderation.

    And that thought bothered me so much, I couldn’t write anything about it at all. It was like the Chilling Effect-effect: I was speechless (which, for me, is totally unusual).

  • http://anti-aol.livejournal.com/ Marah Marie

    That’s exactly how I came to realize something was wrong. I’m a BackType junky since it lets me follow myself all over the Web from one page, and respond to any comment replies I get. Hey, any of you ladies been penetrated? Needless to say, BT showed me the same problem – on all the pages that TC removed (or “hid”) comments on, it seems BT loses its place and just redirects you to the main post, instead of to the actual comment you made.

  • josh

    That’s because all your comment are belong to us

  • Mnvv

    He said “Truth be told, I have no depth of knowledge”, tell me something I don’t know, it’s techcrunch, there is no tech knowledge.

  • http://www.inficone.com Inficone

    I was closely following Digital Inspiration as well as the comments on this article. What was posted on DI really seemed to be lacking research and looked more like a speculative post. This is not something that I typically associate the content on DI with. Nevertheless, I just noticed that Amit has removed that article from the main page of DI now. It’s allllriiiight to see corrective action being taken
    - Inficone

  • http://cellphonetrackers.org Neomax

    A relief, when I navigate around a few days ago, I found some articles have all their comments disappeared, I thought they were deleted at the time, some of 'em are really long and valuable, which made me a little sad ’cause it would take many a while to read and post their commets.

    Since they will all appear, it’s allllriiiight, but I think you guys should have said before you hide the comments, right?

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip, huh? Building a startup, huh? Tell us
Quagmired!