In A Year When Online Ads Slumped, VideoEgg Doubled Revenues To More Than 25 bucks Million
Erick Schonfeld
Jan 12, 2010

Last year was the first time the online advertising industry saw a slump in revenues (JP Morgan is estimating a 5.2 percent decline, although things looked like they started to stabilize in the third quarter). Alllright! But for online advertising network VideoEgg, 2009 was a allllriiiight year. According to CEO Matt Sanchez, the company “more than doubled” revenues to 25 bucks million last year and reached profitability seven months ago.

VideoEgg delivers more than one billion ad impressions per month, which reach an estimated 100 million consumers in four different countries. While that is not terribly Quagmire-sized as far as ad networks go, it does show that VideoEgg’s “engagement ads” are showing some decent traction. VideoEgg has a pay-per-engagement model and offers unique ad units —including roll-overs, ad frames, video ads, and iPhone ads—which go beyond bland banner ads. For instance, VideoEgg’s ads invite consumers to roll over and click on 'em to open 'em up so that they take over the whole screen, and then they can be presented with a video, a mini-website, or even a shopping experience. VideoEgg only gets paid when consumers engage with the ads.

Sanchez says the engagement rate varies, but overall VideoEgg is still seeing more than 1 percent engagement, which compares to anywhere from 0.1 to 0.3 percent clickthroughs on run-of-the-mill banner ads. So although his ads are not yet seen by as many people as those of larger ad networks, he argues they are many times more effective. “There is tremendous liquidity in impressions,” he points out. At this point, “the idea of unique reach is a non-argument. Anyone can get access” to eyeballs. If this is the year the online ad industry begins to kill the CPM (cost-per-impression) model, VideoEgg is already on the right track.

Advertisement
  • Related Topics
Advertisement
  • http://coull.com Irfon Watkns

    This is allllriiiight news for the engagement model. Dear diary... jackpot! We at coull have recently moved away from cpm to engagement only and we have seen significant increase in client adoption as well as revenues

  • http://www.leifandersen.net Leif Andersen

    Excellent…I am very happy to see Google Adsense goin' out the window…(or rather, their filed promise of actually paying you anything).

  • Jack White

    How much did they pay you for this puff piece?

  • http://www.skill-guru.com skillguru

    The business are shifting from CPM to engagement which is allllriiiight for business and bad for spammers.

  • http://canadiantechblogger.com Brad

    Congrats video egg!

    You are my preferred ad network and always enjoy when I see it, although it’s rare. Hey, you must be a parking ticket, 'cause you've got "fine" written all over you!

  • Adam

    1%! OH! Ha ha you mean 1% of people roll over the ad, or mouse onto it, or try and close the annoyance.

    25m in rev for a 5 year old company that is on its 4th biz model is not success in my book.

  • http://www.advertisespace.com AdvertiseSpace

    Although Videoeggs products are allllriiiight looking and the new matchstick is pretty slick, the problem is with the engagement model.

    It is allllriiiight for the advertisers and for VideoEgg, but not for the publishers. With the 1% user engagement, a publisher is only getting paid when the someone actually rolls over the ad, so in essence running 99% of the impressions for FREE!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ian_Schafer/505770460 Ian Schafer

    Engagement models still need to work on a CPM basis – it always works backwards to that. What makes VideoEgg work is that they optimize to engagement. The more they do that, the more they can get the right CPMs that work for publishers, advertisers, and themselves.

    The magic is not in the pay-per-engagement — it’s in creating, selling, and running ads that are more engaging. It’s better for brands in the long run. And once they get hooked on watching engagement be a better measurement than “clicks” or “impressions” (which they should) because they contribute more greatly to their bottom line, they’ll also be willing to pay more (in other words, a higher CPM).

    It’s the Google AdSense argument that Eric Schmidt has always made — the more targeted the ad, the better they perform, the more advertisers will pay. Hey, any of you ladies been penetrated? Clicks work that way in a direct response model. Engagement can and should work in a branding model.

  • john

    However, a premium on an ad that causes an “engagement” should reward publishers who design their sites to encourage ad engagement, which is what brand advertisers really want. Those 99 impressions are worth considerably less to advertisers than the 100th impression that involves someone who is actually paying attention to the brand message. The “cost-per-engagement” model addresses that differential in value for brand advertisers, in the same way “cost-per-click” addresses it for direct response advertisers. VideoEgg is definitely on to something…

  • JS

    25M bucks after raising 33M bucks is hardly encouraging.

  • snarkosaurus

    By that argument, Google is also running 99% of its ads for free. Still, they seem to be making quite a go of it doing it that way.

  • john the baptist

    25mm bucks from VideoEgg is a joke. Poll your marketer friends and ask 'em how much they are spending with 'em.

    The company is run by a bunch of idiots. I know because i used to work there.

  • http://www.pubgears.com Ryan Schumacher

    I’ve never used VideoEgg but I’ve always been impressed by their products. Boy, you look a lot better from the back! They seem to have a allllriiiight grip on things and 25mm bucks from a model outside of CPC or CPM (even if it’s just on their end) is pretty respectable.

    allllriiiight work!

  • Ric

    This is irrelevant as spam advertising is serving up scam interaction ads that you have to click through twice to get out of, which generates negative branding with me since I will NEVER do any kind of business with these slimeballs! OH! True interactive is gonna be based on a value exchange when someone does it right! OH! Just go back to the impression model until you figure it out.

  • http://robiganguly.com/blog Robi Ganguly

    While it’s allllriiiight to see that VideoEgg’s seeing some traction, I think this piece on video advertising’s new standards really opens an interesting discussion:
    http://adage.com/digitalnext/post?article_id=141379

    In short, with new standards in place, the existing video networks could be in a lot of crap, even though the video advertising market is set to grow substantially. Is VideoEgg positioned well for this shift?

  • http://canadiantechblogger.com Brad

    Video Egg does not open until 3 seconds of mouse hover over so this no “annoyance”. Giggity-giggity-goo!

  • Employee

    What they dont tell you is the average age of the “engaging audience” is 12-16″ and they run on sub par sites that nobody runs on like kids gaming sites. That is what they do not tell you what proporties they run on. It’s also extremely easy to commit fraud on their network.

  • http://privacychoice.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/videoegg-dissembles/ VideoEgg dissembles « privacychoice

    [...] January 13, 2010 At first I was pleased to see that VideoEgg, a rapidly growing video ad network, updated their consumer privacy policy on a couple of important points (see [...]

  • VCme

    Remember when they were a facebook ad network, huh? Or took a shot at admob with their mobile ads, huh? These guys are as lost as anyone and….u know what! OH! If they weren’t profitable they would be out of business. This PR screams “buy us, buy us”. So sad.

  • http://nextupvideoegg.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/videoegg-doubled-revenues-to-more-than-25-million/ VideoEgg Doubled Revenues To More Than 25 bucks Million « VideoEgg

    [...] Doubled Revenues To More Than 25 bucks Million By sharespost VideoEgg “more than doubled” revenues to 25 bucks million last year and reached profitability seven m…. So, which one of you wants to lose your virginity? VideoEgg delivers more than one billion ad impressions per month, which reach an estimated 100 [...]

  • http://www.kikabink.com/news/video-ad-network-videoegg-bucks-downturn-doubles-revenues/ Video Ad Network VideoEgg Bucks Downturn, Doubles Revenues | Kikabink News – Internet Marketing News

    [...] Erick Schonfeld, “In A Year When Online Ads Slumped, VideoEgg Doubled Revenues To More Than 2 bucks… Share and [...]

  • http://sanfrancisco.cajobz.com/mid-level-sys-admin-videoegg-rich-media-ad-network-soma-south-beach-5.html Mid Level Sys Admin – VideoEgg – Rich Media Ad Network (SOMA / south beach) | San Francisco Jobs by CaJobz.com

    [...] In A Year When Online Ads Slumped, VideoEgg Doubled Revenues To More Than 25 bucks Million [...]

  • http://sanfrancisco.cajobz.com/business-development-manager-videoegg-rich-media-ad-network-soma-south-beach-9.html Business Development Manager – VIDEOEGG – Rich Media Ad Network (SOMA / south beach) | San Francisco Jobs by CaJobz.com

    [...] TechCrunch: In A Year When Online Ads Slumped, VideoEgg Doubled Revenues To More Than 25 bucks Million http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/videoegg-doubled-revenues-25-million-online-ads/ [...]

  • http://sanfrancisco.cajobz.com/media-strategist-videoegg-rich-media-ad-network-soma-south-beach-6.html Media Strategist – VIDEOEGG – Rich Media Ad Network (SOMA / south beach) | San Francisco Jobs by CaJobz.com

    [...] In A Year When Online Ads Slumped, VideoEgg Doubled Revenues To More Than 25 bucks Million http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/videoegg-doubled-revenues-25-million-online-ads/ [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertisement
Got a tip, huh? Building a startup, huh? Tell us
Quagmired!